
Your weight tells you almost nothing useful. This separates that number into lean mass, body fat, and water, and does it limb by limb rather than as a single whole body figure.
You stand on the platform holding two handles. A small alternating current passes through your body at several frequencies. Lean tissue holds water and conducts it easily. Fat holds far less and resists. Measuring that resistance lets the device estimate what your weight is actually made of.
Multi frequency matters. Different frequencies penetrate cells differently, which allows the device to distinguish water inside cells from water outside them. Segmental measurement matters too, because a whole body average hides imbalance between one limb and another.

Standing, fully clothed · around sixty seconds
The scale gives you one figure that combines everything. These are the components underneath it, and they frequently move in opposite directions.
How much muscle you carry, broken down by limb and trunk rather than reported as a single figure. This is the number that matters most for long term function, and the one most likely to decline quietly with age.
Fat mass in absolute terms and as a percentage of your total. Reported alongside visceral fat, the fat stored around your organs, which carries more metabolic significance than fat stored under the skin.
Total body water split into the portion inside your cells and the portion outside them. The ratio between the two is used as an indicator of fluid balance, and it is also why hydration status affects your reading.
An estimate of the energy your body uses at rest, calculated from your lean mass. Since muscle is metabolically active tissue, this number tends to follow your lean mass rather than your weight.
This distinction is the most important thing to understand about the scan, and most facilities never explain it.
Research comparing InBody devices against DXA found intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.98 or higher for body fat percentage and fat mass, and 0.99 or higher for fat free mass. In practical terms the device gives you nearly the same answer every time under the same conditions, which is exactly what tracking requires.
Multiple studies report that bioelectrical impedance tends to read body fat percentage lower than DXA, with a roughly three percent offset repeatedly confirmed. Your absolute number is therefore an estimate rather than a criterion measurement, and we will tell you that rather than presenting it as definitive.
A study comparing both methods across a four week intervention found no statistically significant difference between DXA and multi frequency BIA when assessing the change in fat mass, fat free mass, or percent body fat. The offset is systematic, so it cancels out when you compare a scan to your own earlier scan. That is why we care about your trend rather than your first number.
Fast, non invasive, and useful for almost anyone with a goal that involves their body changing.
Anyone whose weight has not moved but who suspects their composition has
People training for strength or hypertrophy who need lean mass tracked
Anyone over forty, where lean mass decline is the thing worth catching early
People in a fat loss phase who want to know what they are actually losing
Anyone starting a protocol here, since this is half the baseline
Not appropriate with a pacemaker or other implanted electronic device
The scan itself takes a minute. Consistency in how you arrive matters more than anything that happens during it.

Segmental report · explained, not just printed
This is an assessment rather than a treatment. What it gives you is information, and its value depends on what gets done with it.
Skeletal muscle mass reported per limb and trunk rather than as one figure
Fat mass and body fat percentage measured rather than estimated from weight
Visceral fat reported separately from subcutaneous fat
Intracellular and extracellular water, and the ratio between them
Basal metabolic rate derived from your measured lean mass
Left to right and upper to lower imbalance made visible
A repeatable baseline with very high test to test reliability
Change over time tracked accurately across a protocol
VO₂ max tells us what your system can do. This tells us what it is working with. Together they are where every protocol here starts.
Scanned alongside your VO₂ max test, under standardised conditions so subsequent scans are genuinely comparable.
Typically rescanned at the midpoint and at completion. Composition often moves before performance markers do, which makes this an early signal.
Same conditions, same time of day where possible. The offset against DXA is systematic, so your own trend line is what carries the meaning.
These devices have been compared against DXA and isotope dilution in published studies. Here is what those comparisons actually found.
All three bioelectrical impedance devices were reliable in men and women, with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.98 or higher for body fat percentage and fat mass, and 0.99 or higher for fat free mass.
Read together, these papers say something quite specific. The device is highly repeatable, agreeing with itself to within a fraction of a percent. It also reads body fat around three percent lower than DXA, consistently. Because that bias is systematic rather than random, it disappears when you compare your scan to your own earlier scan, which is why change tracked accurately in the four week study. So we will give you your absolute numbers and tell you honestly they are estimates. What we will hold you to is the direction they move.
Very accurate at detecting change, and good but not perfect at absolute values. Studies consistently find it reads body fat around three percent lower than DXA. Because that offset is systematic, your trend over time is reliable even though your single number is an estimate.
DXA remains the reference standard for absolute body composition. This is faster, involves no radiation, costs less, and can be repeated as often as you like, which makes it better suited to tracking. Research supports using it as a surrogate when DXA is not available.
Because the method measures resistance through body water, and your hydration shifts constantly. Food, fluid, exercise, sauna, and time of day all affect it. This is why we standardise conditions and compare like with like rather than reading meaning into a single scan.
You can, but the result will be less comparable. Exercise, sweating, sauna, and contrast therapy all shift fluid distribution. Scanning before those things, ideally fasted, gives you numbers worth comparing.
Yes for almost everyone. The current is imperceptible and there is no radiation involved. It is not appropriate for anyone with a pacemaker, defibrillator, or other implanted electronic device, and we ask before scanning.
That is frequently the most interesting result. People often gain lean mass and lose fat in similar amounts, leaving the scale unmoved while composition has shifted meaningfully. Without this scan that progress is invisible.
Usually skeletal muscle mass, particularly past forty. Lean tissue is what supports function, metabolic rate, and independence later in life, and it declines quietly unless it is defended. Body fat matters, but it is rarely the number we would prioritise first.
Typically at baseline, midpoint, and completion of a protocol. Scanning more often than every few weeks mostly measures hydration rather than composition, which is where people misread the data.
Baseline and follow up scans are included within protocols. For members, access depends on your tier, and it can also be booked on its own.
This sits alongside the other measurements that open a protocol.
The other half of the baseline. What your system can do, measured directly through gas analysis.
The wider diagnostic picture, from composition through to physician led panels.
See how this measurement supports the system addressing capacity, output, and durability.
Your weight tells you almost nothing useful. This separates that number into lean mass, body fat, and water, and does it limb by limb rather than as a single whole body figure.
Longevity Gyms · 7030 Hi Tech Drive, Suite 102, Hanover, MD 21076 · 410-858-4086 · Clinical oversight through the Institute for Human Optimization.
Measurement is where your protocol starts. In your consultation we will: